Invalidation of adversarial procedures as a result of fundamental and oral defects (a comparative study(

Article Sidebar

PDF (العربية)
Published: Jul 14, 2024
Keywords:
Written defects, oral defects, invalidity of procedures, lack of justification, adherence to invalidity, arbitrator errors

Main Article Content

Maaalayn Salim Wali
Ghassan Obaid Al-Mamouri

Abstract

Customs have settled on using the term invalidation in the dictionary of procedural principles, where invalidation is considered synonymous with the punishment or penalty of the Penal Code, meaning that they have the same meaning. Just as there is a text in the Penal Code that includes the phrase (there is no crime and no punishment except by a text), here too we can call invalidation as a penalty for failure.  Regarding some of the procedures taken by opponents or arbitrators, the arbitrator does not rule on procedural invalidity unless there are reasons and motives calling for that. Either these reasons are fundamental that lead to invalidity or secondary reasons that result in penalties other than invalidity. It becomes clear that the importance of invalidation is that it does not result in only one stage in the dispute, but rather it accompanies it from the time of its procedures until the issuance of the arbitral award. Thus, the adversary’s procedures may be invalidated, or the arbitration award may be affected as a result of the invalidation of those procedures

Article Details

How to Cite
Salim Wali م. ا., & Obaid Al-Mamouri غ. (2024). Invalidation of adversarial procedures as a result of fundamental and oral defects (a comparative study(. MIsan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 1(10), 370–404. Retrieved from https://uomisan.edu.iq/law/mjcls/index.php/mjcls/article/view/311
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): Misan Journal for Comparative Legal Studies
Section
Articles

Licenses and Copyright

The following policy applies in MJCLS:
MJCLS applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by MJCLS, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that MJCLS content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
If you have written permission to do so, yes. If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don''t assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn''t clear who the owner is or what license applies. It''s up to you to ascertain what rights you have—if any—to use that content.
Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their PLOS paper, but that’s not necessarily the case – it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content.If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your MJCLSpaper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that QJAS if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your MJCLS paper. Please do not include any content in your QJAS paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution (https://www.uomisan.edu.iq/law/mjcls/process?ethics) .
If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
MJCLS reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.

How to Cite
E.A.Makttoof , Kassim J.K , K.H (2020). Distribution of different forms of phosphorus in calcareous soils from middle and south of Iraq . Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Agriculture Sciences,10, 1, 2020, 293-303.

References

اولاً_ المعاجم العربية :

• القاموس المحيط، الجزء الثالث.

ثانياً_ الكتب القانونية :

أحمد ابو الوفا , التحكيم الاختياري والاجباري , الطبعة الثانية ,دار المطبوعات الجامعية ,الاسكندرية , 2007.

أحمد فتحي سرور, نظرية البطلان في قانون الاجراءات الجنائية ,الطبعة الاولى , مكتبة النهضة المصرية , مصر ,1959.

طلال محمد كاظم الزهيري ,دور القضاء في منازعات التحكيم في القانونين اللبناني والعراقي ,الطبعة الاولى ,دار الدكتور للعلوم , بغداد ,2021, ص137 .

عبد الحكيم فوده، البطلان في القانون المدني والقانون الخاص، الطبعة الثانية، دار المطبوعات الجامعية، الاسكندرية، ١٩٩٣.

عبد الرزاق السنهوري , الوسيط في شرح القانون المدني "مصادر الالتزام", دار احياء التراث العربي , بيروت ,1952.

عصام عبد الفتاح مطر, التحكيم الالكتروني ,دار الجامعة الجديدة, الاسكندرية ,مصر,200

الغوثي بن ملحة، القانون القضائي الجزائري، بدون طبعة , ديوان المطبوعات الجامعية، الجزائر، ١٩٩5.

فتحي والي واحمد ماهر زغلول ,نظرية البطلان في قانون المرافعات ,منشأة المعارف ,الاسكندرية ,1997.

كامل السعيد , شرح قانون اصول المحاكمات الجزائية ,الطبعة الاولى ,دار الثقافة والنشر والتوزيع ,عمان ,2005.

لؤي جميل حدادين، نظرية البطلان في قانون اصول المحاكمات الجزائية دراسة مقارنة، الطبعة الأولى، دار وائل، عمان، ٢٠٠٠.

محمد أحمد سويلم، مفهوم بطلان الحكم القضائي والتمييز بينه وبين الجزاءات الاجرائية الاخرى، الطبعة الأولى، الجزء الأول، دار العدل، السعودية، ٢٠١٤.

منير عبد المجيد , التنظيم القانوني للتحكيم الدولي والداخلي في ضوء الفقه والقضاء ,الاسكندرية, مصر,1997

ثالثاً_ الرسائل والاطاريح

•حميدي ليديا, نظرية البطلان في قانون الاجراءات الجزائية الجزائري , (رسالة ماجستير مقدمة الى كلية الحقوق ),جامعة بجاية, الجزائر ,2016.

رابعاً_ البحوث المنشورة

ابراهيم خليل الموسوي ، الضمانات الإجرائية لخصومة التحكيم الالكتروني ، بحث منشور في مجلة ميسان للدراسات القانونية المقارنة ، العدد السابع ، المجلد الاول ، كلية القانون ، ميسان ، العراق ، ص ٩٦

انوار محمد هادي ، التزام المحكم بالحياد والاستقلال والعواقب المترتبة على الإخلال بها ( دراسة مقارنة ) ، بحث منشور في مجلة ميسان للدراسات القانونية المقارنة ، جامعة ميسان ، العراق ، ص ٥٦-٥٧ .

زيبار الشاذلي, بوهنتالة ياسين , الضمانات القانونية للهيئة التحكيمية (دراسة مقارنة),بحث منشور في مجلة طبنة للدراسات العلمية الاكاديمية ,العدد الاول ,المجلد الرابع ,2021.

علي محسن طويب ، دور التحكيم في مجال العقود الادارية في العراق ، بحث منشور في مجلة ميسان للدراسات القانونية المقارنة ، جامعة الامام جعفر الصادق (ع) ، ميسان ، العراق ، ص ٢٠١.

خامساً_ المجلات والدوريات

عبد الحميد الاحدب , مجلة التحكيم العالمية ,العدد الحادي عشر , 2011.

عبد الحميد الاحدب ,مجلة التحكيم العالمية, العدد الثامن ,2010.

عبد الحميد الاحدب ، مجلة التحكيم العالمية ، العدد الواحد والعشرون ،٢٠١٤.

سادساً_ القوانين والقرارات القضائية والاتفاقيات والقواعد

_ القوانين

• قانون التحكيم البلجيكي لسنة 1998

• قانون التحكيم الفرنسي رقم 48 لسنة 2011

• قانون التحكيم الفيدرالي الامريكي لسنة 1925

• قانون التحكيم المصري رقم 27 لسنة 1994

• قانون المرافعات المدنية العراقي رقم 83 لسنة 1969

• قانون المرافعات المدنية المصري رقم 13 لسنة 1968

• مشروع قانون التحكيم العراقي لسنة2011

_القرارات القضائية

• قرار الهيئة الموسعة ,محكمة التمييز الاتحادية ,رقم 371/الهيئة الموسعة المدنية /2021.

• قرار المركز الدولي لتسوية منازعات الاستثمار بين الدول ومواطني الدول الاخرى في واشنطن (الاكسيد )

• قرار محكمة استئناف القاهرة رقم (127لسنة 123ق)

• قرار محكمة استئناف القاهرة رقم 12 لسنة 125 ق.

_القواعد والاتفاقيات

• اتفاقية واشنطن (الاكسيد).

• اتفاقية نيويورك لسنة (1958).

• قواعد الاونسيترال للتحكيم التجاري الدولي لسنة (2021) .

Sources

Firstly, Arabic dictionaries:

• Ocean Dictionary, Part Three.

Second: Legal books:

Abd al-Razzaq al-Sanhouri, the mediator in explaining the civil law, “Sources of Obligation,” Dar Revival of Arab Heritage, Beirut, 1952.

Abdel Hakim Fouda, Invalidation in Civil Law and Private Law, second edition, University Press House, Alexandria, 1993.

Ahmed Abu Al-Wafa, Voluntary and Compulsory Arbitration, second edition, University Press House, Alexandria, 2007

Ahmed Fathi Sorour, The Theory of Invalidation in the Code of Criminal Procedure, first edition, Egyptian Nahda Library, Egypt, 1959.

Al-Ghouthi Ben Melha, Algerian Judicial Law, without edition, Office of University Publications, Algeria, 1995.

Awad Al-Zoubi, Al-Wajeez fi Jordanian Civil Procedure Code, second edition, Publishing and Distribution House, Amman, 2006.

Essam Abdel Fattah Matar, Electronic Arbitration, New University House, Alexandria, Egypt, 2009.

Fathi Wali and Ahmed Maher Zaghloul, The Theory of Invalidation in the Law of Procedures, Mansha’at Al-Ma’arif, Alexandria, 1997.

Kamel Al-Saeed, Explanation of the Code of Criminal Procedure, first edition, House of Culture, Publishing and Distribution, Amman, 2005.

Louay Jamil Haddadin, The Theory of Invalidation in the Code of Criminal Procedure, a Comparative Study, first edition, Dar Wael, Amman, 2000.

Mounir Abdel Majeed, The Legal Regulation of International and Domestic Arbitration in the Light of Jurisprudence and Jurisprudence, Alexandria, Egypt, 1997. Ibrahim Radwan Al-Jaghbir, Invalidation of the Arbitrator’s Award, First Edition, House of Culture for Design and Production, 2009.

Muhammad Ahmed Sweilem, The Concept of Invalidity of a Judicial Judgment and the Distinction between it and Other Procedural Sanctions, First Edition, Part One, House of Justice, Saudi Arabia, 2014.

Third: Theses and dissertations

• Hamidi Lydia, The Theory of Invalidation in the Algerian Code of Criminal Procedure, (Master’s thesis submitted to the Faculty of Law), University of Bejaia, Algeria, 2016.

Fourth: Published research

Ali Mohsen Tawaib, A trend in the field of administrative contracts in Iraq, research published in Maysan Magazine for Unofficial Documents, Imam Jaafar al-Sadiq University (peace be upon him), Maysan, Iraq, p. 201

Anwar Muhammad Hadi, The Firm Pledge of Neutrality and Independence and the Common Consequences for Violating It (Comparison)( A comparative study) , research published in the Maysan Journal for Privacy Request, Maysan University, Iraq, pp. 56-57.

Ibrahim Khalil Al-Musawi, Procedural Guarantees for an Electronic Vector Adversary) A comparative study (, research published in the Maysan Patent Journal, Issue Seven, Volume One, College of Law, Maysan, Iraq, p. 96

Zibar Al-Shazly, Buhantala Yassin, Legal Guarantees for the Arbitration Body (Comparative Study), research published in the Tabna Journal of Academic Scientific Studies, First Issue, Fourth Volume, 2021.

Fifth: Magazines and periodicals

Abdul Hamid Al-Ahdab, International Arbitration Journal, Issue Eleven, 2011.

Abdul Hamid Al-Ahdab, International Arbitration Journal, Issue 8, 2010.

Abdul Hamid Al-Ahdab, International Arbitration Journal, Issue Twenty-One, 2014.

Sixth: Foreign sources

Bordeaux(R), philosophy of civil procedure, 1 vol., 1857, p. 533

Seventh: Laws, judicial decisions, agreements and rules

_ Laws

• Belgian Arbitration Act 1998

• Draft Iraqi Arbitration Law of 2011

• Egyptian Arbitration Law No. 27 of 1994

• Egyptian Civil Procedure Law No. 13 of 1968

• French Arbitration Law No. 48 of 2011

• Iraqi Civil Procedure Law No. 83 of 1969

• US Federal Arbitration Act of 1925

_Judicial decisions

• Cairo Court of Appeal Decision No. (127 of 123 BC)

• Cairo Court of Appeal Decision No. 12 of 125 BC.

• Decision of the Expanded Authority, Federal Court of Cassation, No. 371/Expanded Civil Authority/2021.

• Decision of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Citizens of Other States in Washington (ICSID)

_Rules and agreements

• New York Convention of 1958.

• UNCITRAL Rules for International Commercial Arbitration for the year (2021).

• Washington Agreement (ACS).