Legal Responsibility for Errors of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Light of Human Rights (a comparative study)

Article Sidebar

PDF (العربية)
Published: Feb 9, 2026
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence. Legal Responsibility. Human Rights. Algorithmic Errors

Main Article Content

Khalid Mhawi Mroshn

Abstract

The world is witnessing rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, which are now profoundly impacting various sectors such as justice, education, and healthcare. However, these systems may commit errors due to data bias or programming deficiencies, leading to violations of human rights such as the right to privacy, equality, and a fair trial. This raises a legal dilemma regarding the adequacy of traditional accountability frameworks and the identification of the responsible party: the programmer, the manufacturer, or the user.


This study addresses the issue by analyzing the legal and technical concepts of AI systems and clarifying the impact of their errors on civil, political, and economic rights. It also highlights emerging legal challenges, such as the difficulty of tracing the source of error and the complexity of AI algorithms, as well as the lack of specialized legislation that keeps pace with these developments. The study proposes the need to develop a specific legal framework that ensures accountability while aligning technological innovation with the protection of fundamental human rights

Article Details

How to Cite
Mhawi Mroshn خ. (2026). Legal Responsibility for Errors of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Light of Human Rights (a comparative study). MIsan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 14(1-1), 44–78. Retrieved from https://uomisan.edu.iq/law/mjcls/index.php/mjcls/article/view/507
Issue
Vol. 14 No. 1-1 (2026): Misan Journal for Comparative Legal Studies
Section
Articles

Licenses and Copyright

The following policy applies in MJCLS:
MJCLS applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by MJCLS, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that MJCLS content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
If you have written permission to do so, yes. If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don''t assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn''t clear who the owner is or what license applies. It''s up to you to ascertain what rights you have—if any—to use that content.
Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their PLOS paper, but that’s not necessarily the case – it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content.If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your MJCLSpaper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that QJAS if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your MJCLS paper. Please do not include any content in your QJAS paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution (https://www.uomisan.edu.iq/law/mjcls/process?ethics) .
If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
MJCLS reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.

How to Cite
E.A.Makttoof , Kassim J.K , K.H (2020). Distribution of different forms of phosphorus in calcareous soils from middle and south of Iraq . Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Agriculture Sciences,10, 1, 2020, 293-303.

References

أولا: قائمة المراجع باللغة العربية:

(1) أحمد إبراهيم محمد إبراهيم، المسئولية الجنائية الناتجة عن أخطاء الذكاء الاصطناعي في التشريع الإماراتي، دراسة مقارنة، رسالة دكتوراه، كلية الحقوق، جامعة عين شمس، ٢٠٢٠.

(2) أحمد عوض بلال، مبادئ قانون العقوبات المصري، القسم العام، دار النهضة العربية، القاهرة.

(3) حسين يوسف أبو منصور: الذكاء الاصطناعي وابعاده، أوراق السياسة الأمنية، جامعة نايف للعلوم الأمنية، عدد 1، 2020.

(4) خالد حسن أحمد، الذكاء الاصطناعي وحمايته من الناحية المدنية والجنائية، دار الفكر الجامعي، الإسكندرية، 2021م.

(5) عبدالعظيم مرسي وزير، شرح قانون العقوبات، القسم العام، دار النهضة العربية، القاهرة، 2008.

(6) محمد جبريل إبراهيم، المسئولية الجنائية عن جرائم الروبوت (دراسة تحليلية)، دار النهضة العربية،، القاهرة، 2022م.

(7) محمد شوقي العناني، د. إسلام هديب، الذكاء الاصطناعي ودوره في مكافحة الفساد، دار النهضة العربية،، القاهرة، 2022م.

(8) محمد محيي الدين عوض، مشكلات السياسة الجنائية المعاصرة في جرائم نظم المعلومات (الكمبيوتر)، المؤتمر السادس للجمعية المصرية للقانون الجنائي، 25 – 28 أكتوبر 1993.

(9) ام كلثوم صبح. اَدَ اسماء صبر. القانون الواجب التطبيق على المسؤول ية التقصير ية عن الضرر البيولوجي. بحث منشور في مجلة ميسان للدراسات القانونية المقارنة 2025 .

(10) رسل سعدون ،ا د عامر زغير، د حسين ياسين، دور الإدارة العامة في تحقيق أهداف الجزاءات الجنائية. بحث منشور في مجلة ميسان للدراسات القانونية المقارنة 2025.

(11) م. سجى فالح حسن، م.م حسين خليل مطر، انتهاك خصوصية الاطفال عبر. الانترنت في التشريع العراقي. البحث منشور في مجلة ميسان للدراسات القانونية المقارنة 2025.

ثانيا: قائمة المراجع باللغة الأجنبية:

(1) Adrien Bonnet, La Responsabilité du fait de l’intelligenceartificielle, M ScThèse, Université Pantheon-Assas, Paris II, 2015.

(2) Adrien Bonnet, La Responsabilité du fait de l’intelligence, Master de Droitprivégénéraldirigé par Yves Lequette, Université Pantheon-Assas, 2015.

(3) Bignami, F., Privacy and law enforcement in the European Union: The data retention directive, Chicago J. International Law 8, 2000.

(4) Bignami, F., Privacy and law enforcement in the European Union: The data retention directive, Chicago J. International Law 8, 2007.

(5) Christophe Lachièze, Intelligence artificielle : quelmodèle de responsabilité ?Dalloz IP/IT, 2020 ; Galbois-Lehalle Diane, Responsabilitécivile pour l’intelligenceartificielleselonBruxelles : une initiative à saluer, des dispositions à améliorer, Dalloz, 2021.

(6)Cimo Xue, Liability Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles Accidents, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, Vol. 185, 2021.

(7)Gabriel Hallevy, When robots kill : artificial intelligence under criminal law, Northeastern University Press, Boston, 2013.

(8)Ildar Begishev, Diana Bersei, Lyudmila Sherbakova, Ruslan Zhirova, Olga Kolesnikova, Problems of legal regulation of unmanned vehicles, Transportation Research Procedia 63 (2022).

(9)Kuner, C., European data protection law—corporate compliance and regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

(10)Laura Ellyson, La responsabilitécriminelle et l’intelligenceartificielle: quelquespistes de réflexion, Les Cahiers de propriétéintellectuelle, Vol. 30(3), 2018.

(11)Nadiah K. Kadir and Judhariksawan, Terrorism and Cyberspace: A Phenomenon of Cyber-Terrorism as Transnational Crimes, Fiat JustisiaJurnalIlmuHukum, Vol. 13(4), 2019.

(12)Nathalie Voarino, Systèmesd’intelligenceartificielle et santé: les enjeuxd’une innovation responsable. Uneanalyse des craintes et des attentescitoyennes face aux défis de l’exercice de la responsabilité, Thèse, Université de Montréal, 2019.

(13)Rajendra Akerkar, Artificial Intelligence for Business, Springer Briefs in Business, Springer, Cham, 2019.

(14)Roos, A., Law Core principles of data protection law, The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2006.

(15)Sabine Gless, Emily Silverman, Thomas Weigend, If Robots Cause Harm, Who Is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability, New Criminal Law Review, SSRN, January 29, 2016.

(16)Shchitova, A.A., Definition of Artificial Intelligence for Legal Regulation, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 156, 2020.

(17)Stanley Greenstein, Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI), Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 30, 2022.

(18)State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis 2016). Harvard Law Review, Criminal Law, 2017.

(19)StéphaneRoder, Guide pratique de l’intelligenceartificielledansl’entreprise: Anticiper les transformations, mettre en place des solutions, Eyrolles ed., 2019.

(20)Themistoklis Tzimas, Artificial Intelligence as Global Commons and the “International Law Supremacy” Principle, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 211, 2018.

(21)Tom C.W. Lin, Artificial Intelligence, Finance, and the Law, Fordham L. Rev., Vol. 88(2), 2019.

(22)Visa A.J. Kurki, Tomasz Pietrzykowski, Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn, Springer, Switzerland, 2017.

(23)Wooldridge M., Jennings, N. R., Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 10, n°2, June 1995.

(24)Wright, E.E., The Right to Privacy in Electronic Communications: Current Fourth Amendment and Statutory Protection in the Wake of Warshak v. United States, J. Law and Policy for Information Society, 3(3), 2007.

(25)YaminaBouadi, Intelligence artificielle, justice pénale et protection des données à caractère personnel, M ScThèse, Université de Strasbourg, 2020.

(26)Yaroslav Shiryaev, Cyberterrorism in the context of contemporary international law, San Diego Int’l L.J., Vol. 13, 2012.

List of References in English

(1) Ahmed Ibrahim Mohamed Ibrahim, Criminal Liability Arising fromArtificial Intelligence Errors in Emirati Legislation: A Comparative Study, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Law, Ain Shams University, 2020

(2) Ahmed Awad Bilal, Principles of Egyptian Criminal Law: General Part, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia, Cairo.

(3) Hussein Youssef Abu Mansour, Artificial Intelligence and Its Dimensions, Security Policy Papers, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, No. 1, 2020.

(4) Khaled Hassan Ahmed, Artificial Intelligence and Its Protection from Civil and Criminal Perspectives, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Jamei, Alexandria, 2021.

(5) Abdel AzimMorsiWazir, Commentary on the Penal Code: General Part, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia, Cairo, 2008.

(6) Mohamed Gabreel Ibrahim, Criminal Liability for Robot Crimes: An Analytical Study, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia, Cairo, 2022.

(7) Mohamed Shawky Al-Anani& Dr. Islam Hudeib, Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Combating Corruption, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia, Cairo, 2022.

(8) Mohamed MohyEldinAwad, Contemporary Criminal Policy Issues in Computer Crimes, The Sixth Conference of the Egyptian Society for Criminal Law, 25–28 October 1993.

(9) Umm KulthumSobh, and Asmaa Saber. The Applicable Law on Tort Liability for Biological Damage. Published in the Misan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 2025.

(10) RusalSaadoun, Prof. AmerZgair, and Dr. Hussein Yaseen. The Role of Public Administration in Achieving the Objectives of Criminal Sanctions. Published in the Misan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 2025.

(11) Asst. Lecturer SajaFaleh Hassan, and Asst. Lecturer Hussein Khalil Matar. Violation of Children's Privacy on the Internet in Iraqi Legislation. Published in the Misan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 2025.